|
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Reproduction of any material from this website
(text or photographic) is strictly forbidden without the prior permission of the
copyright owner.
If you would like to use any of the material on
this website, please contact me via the Feedback page, and I will put you in
contact with the appropriate copyright owner.
Every effort is made to ensure that photographs
on this website are produced with the consent of the copyright owner. If you
believe any image on this website to be in breach of copyright, please contact
me immediately so that it can be removed.
| |
|
PRESTON
STATION REMODELLING |
Preston
Station Remodelling
BY MIKE NORRIS
Mike would like to
hear from anyone involved with the remodelling and resignalling of
the station and surrounding area to aid historical research for
future documentation, please contact via the Feedback
page.
|
SECTION
CONTENTS
1. Background
2. Project
Approval & Planning
3. The
Work at Preston
4. Signalling
& Power Box Commissioning
5. Electrification,
Catenary & Electricity Supply
6. Delays
7. Locomotives
8. Media
9. It's
Official! |
| 5.
Electrification, Catenary & Electricity Supply |
| Electrification |
| The principle
contractors for the electrification on London Midland region were
Pirelli Construction Co. Ltd and British Insulated Callenders
Construction Co. Ltd. (BICC)
This work involved the raising of many existing structures:
219 bridges between Weaver Junction and Gretna had to be
modified to some degree.
90 bridges had to be completely reconstructed.
40 were raised bodily between 12 and 18 inches.
22 were widened or realigned for Highway Authority road
improvement schemes.
There were also 77 other lineside buildings and outdoor switch gear
plinths constructed.
By February 1971 Pirelli-General was ready to commence mast
foundations between Weaver Junction and Preston, whilst BICC was the
contractor north of Bolton-le-Sands and mast foundation work was due
to start there in Spring 1971. By August 1972 electrification masts
had started to appear in the station. Between Weaver Junction and
Gretna 9,337 masts were required and in the first year 1,991 had been
erected.
Special trains used to were used to erect the masts and overhead
wires. The first one makes holes for the structures using rail mounted
equipment, these can be grabs or augers depending on the ground
conditions.
This next train would pour concrete foundations, normally there are
eight units on a train each capable of mixing six cubic yards. A total
of 11026 concrete foundations were needed on the London Midland
section, there also seemed to be a short train which was used around
the Preston area.
This would be followed by a mast erection train, the typical type
of mast used on the Weaver Junction to Gretna section were a simple
girder type. These masts are located approx 60 metres apart and the
works trains carried between 60 and 100 masts and an eight man gang
could erect a train load in eight hours.
Finally this would be followed by a wiring up train of specially
modified coaches with a flat top to enable the gangs to complete the
wiring.
|
This
picture taken by Bill Ashcroft shows a northbound Class 104 DMU
leaving the former platform 4. The modifications to
Fishergate Bridge clearly visible, this work was to provide the
necessary clearance for the overhead traction wires. A new foot was
added to the existing girder beams and the original foot them removed.
In the background can be seen the brand new parcel platform and goods
lines.
|
| Catenary |
| The overhead wires
in areas of multiple tracks were supported by a method called of
construction is called ‘head span’ wiring, this entailed using
cross support wires stretched between the masts. The catenery wires
being supported on the cross wires. The use of ‘head span’ type of
construction surrendered the use of an independent mechanical support
for each contact wire and this further reduced its impact on the
environment and also reduced cost.
The head span method was one of the key items which enabled the
cost of the electrification to be reduced by some 25% over the cost of
the electrification south of Weaver Junction, which used steel portal
construction. The head spans were usually prefabricated off site.
Added to this the two wire catenery used north of Weaver Junction
was designed to further reduce the cost of the electrification, and
without which it is unlikely the electrification would have got the go
ahead.
The 1966 line to Euston used mark 1 compound catenary with a
maximum permitted speed of 100mph. Experiments showed it ‘hogged’
making it higher mid span giving poor current collection. Whereas a
contact wire with some sag led to a design of simple catenary that
gave good current collection well in excess of 100mph.
The Mk1 catenery had cadmium-copper main and auxiliary wire and a
level cadmium-copper contact wire with copper wire droppers.
The sagged type was designated Mark 11 and consisted of hard drawn
copper catenary wire and a hard drawn copper contact wire with bronze
strand droppers.
By the time the west coast scheme was under consideration aluminium
conductor steel reinforced (a.c.s.r.) conductors were in use on
transmission lines and on other railways and tests were made on some 8
miles north of Crewe. Subject to modification this became known as
Mk111A and was adopted for the Weaver Junction - Glasgow scheme, it
showed a saving of £200 a mile over hard drawn copper and the use of
stainless steel droppers gave a further reduction of £110 per mile.
The Mk111A reduced the separation between the catenery wire and the
contact wire, simplifying the support design and with a reduction in
the height of support masts.
A number of the steel portal structures were used just north of
Fishergate Bridge; these span all the tracks, but were not the norm on
this project due to cost. This area contained some of the longest
spans of the whole project and the structures were needed due to the
track density and complexity. This type of structure was used
extensively on the Crewe, Manchester, Liverpool and London
electrification.
|
| Electricity
Supply |
| The overhead
traction wires north of Preston are supplied from feeder stations at
Catteral near Garstang, and Natland between Milnthorpe and Oxenholme.
With intermediate track sectioning cabins at Bay Horse, Hest Bank,
Burton and Holme, Grayrigg, Tebay and Harrison’s sidings. While
power for the Weaver Junction to Preston section is taken from the
National Gird at Parkside at 132 Kv. Track sectioning cabins on the
southern section were located at Action Grange, Wigan, Euxton and
Preston.
Feeder stations and track sectioning installations are monitored by
the Electric control room at Crewe. When the electrification was
completed the Crewe control room supervised supply from Rugeley
(Staffs) to Tebay.
A new lab coach was used to test the operating conditions of the
overhead equipment. It was called MENTOR (Mobile Electrical Network
Testing Observation and Recording).
Finally in May 1973 the section from the south to Preston was
energised.
|
|
|
| |
|